Re: The gstreamer third way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 19:12 +0000, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora <at> nicubunu.ro> writes:
> > No. The ugly gstreamer plugins don't have a license problem, but a 
> > patents problem and this problem apply only on certain parts of the 
> > world, there are other parts where they are perfectly fine from any 
> > point of view.
> 
> Yet third-party repositories are happily distributing proprietary kmod-nvidia 
> modules linked against the GPLv2 kernel, which isn't any more legal than 
> distributing a GPLv2 kio_smb linked against a GPLv3 Samba would be.

Last I checked they're not distributing both kmod-nvidia and kernels in
the same repo

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux