Trying to install from development repository: Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Updating: gimp x86_64 2:2.4.0-0.rc3.1.fc8 development 13 M Updating for dependencies: evince x86_64 2.20.0-3.fc8 development 1.2 M gimp-libs x86_64 2:2.4.0-0.rc3.1.fc8 development 574 k glibc x86_64 2.6.90-18 development 4.8 M glibc i686 2.6.90-18 development 5.4 M glibc-common x86_64 2.6.90-18 development 21 M glibc-devel x86_64 2.6.90-18 development 2.4 M glibc-headers x86_64 2.6.90-18 development 598 k koffice-core x86_64 1.6.3-11.fc8 development 1.7 M koffice-filters x86_64 1.6.3-11.fc8 development 2.1 M koffice-kexi x86_64 1.6.3-11.fc8 development 3.4 M koffice-krita x86_64 1.6.3-11.fc8 development 31 M koffice-libs x86_64 1.6.3-11.fc8 development 4.6 M poppler x86_64 0.6-1.fc8 development 3.1 M poppler-qt x86_64 0.6-1.fc8 development 29 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 0 Package(s) Update 15 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 95 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/5): glibc-headers-2.6. 100% |=========================| 598 kB 00:04 (2/5): glibc-2.6.90-18.i6 100% |=========================| 5.4 MB 00:42 (3/5): glibc-devel-2.6.90 100% |=========================| 2.4 MB 00:18 (4/5): glibc-2.6.90-18.x8 100% |=========================| 4.8 MB 00:38 (5/5): glibc-common-2.6.9 100% |=========================| 21 MB 02:42 Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: Package glibc-devel needs glibc = 2.6-4, this is not available. Package glibc-devel needs glibc = 2.6-4, this is not available. Package glibc-devel needs glibc-headers = 2.6-4, this is not available. Package glibc-devel needs glibc-headers = 2.6-4, this is not available. Complete! There is no explanation about the package which can confuse users. It looks like those packagers are identical but there is no specification about the architectures. I have submitted a bug report on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328141 Luya -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
