Le Jeu 11 octobre 2007 16:55, Les Mikesell a écrit : > If you have the right to distribute each component separately and the > existence of a usable gplv2 copy prevents things that happen to link > to the gplv3 version from being considered a derivative work, what's the > problem Because you can't limit yourself to analysing components separately. The distribution itself is an aggregate work that is subject to copyright laws as a whole. In a distribution context since yum or anaconda will always choose to install foo with GPLv3 samba you can't handwave "there was a GPLv2 samba on the buildsys". That's not what users get through pour distribution. And it's not mere aggregation since one links to the other. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
