Re: should readahead allow generic paths?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 09:20 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> Tossing a default list out there and hoping for the best probably won't
>> work, at any rate.
> 
> So are we going to get your fixed lists into F8 ?
> 

Well, part of the problem is that "my" fixed lists may not be everyone's
fixed lists - I generated a custom list from *my* boot sequence.  Coming
up with a good default list that actually speeds *everyone's* boot time
is another issue.  If we think it's worth the 4 second or so boottime
reduction, maybe some way to automatically generate the custom lists
during firstboot might be an option.  But then, they will rot over time...

I'm also testing the SuSE hack of telling glibc to readahead shared
libraries...

-Eric

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux