Once upon a time, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> said: > So you must distribute it together with a GPLv2 licensed samba, so no loop > holes here (luckily!). Okay, so you distribute both the GPLv2 and GPLv3 libraries, with the GPLv2 version named something like "compat-libsomething". Then it depends on which one gets installed as to whether a license violation occurs. If you take the case of anaconda (where the shortest package name "wins" to satisfy the libsomething.so.0 dependency), the GPLv3 library would always be installed. Or you get crazier and you use the alternatives system; install both and let the user switch (but have the GPLv3 version the default). -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
