On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 18:00 -0400, Stewart Adam wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 23:16 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 23:14 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > > > While I think your idea about these descriptions is good, it seems > > > entirely infeasible, [...] > > > > Rereading my message, I should clarify this: It's not entirely > > infeasible as a concept; but as you had worded it (Stewart), it would > > have been so. > That's true, I forgot about that. How does this sound: > > "Totem's backend specifies which set of codecs Totem should use to play > multimedia files. Selecting Gstreamer will use all installed gstreamer > codecs, while selecting Xine will use all available Xine codecs." That wouldn't really help, would it? What are xine-lib and GStreamer, what do they play? The xine-lib backend is fine for power-users to choose (or their admins make the choice for them), but it's not something you'd want to present to users. I'll mention it once again: I don't want to see this sort of dialogue in Totem, or in the default installation. After that, feel free to discuss implementation and wording for addition in another add-on application. > PS. Doesn't xine-lib itself support DVD menus, just not (css-)encrypted > ones? No, as there's no MPEG-2 video decoder in Fedora's xine-lib (and if there is, it shouldn't be there). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
