Re: samba license change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 11:51 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le Mer 10 octobre 2007 07:10, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
> > 
> > > Well, it matters very much to individuals if they want to endanger
> > > themselves by the uncertainties of a "brand new" license a political
> > > organization with controversial (some say "fundamentalist zealotic")
> > > attitude (the FSF) tries to enforce.
> > 
> > Then don't link to GPLv3 code. Simple. Easy.
> False - This is not easy. 
> 
> > Don't ask for the freedom to make licensing choices then deny it to
> > other projects because they happen to make a different choice than
> > yours (and incidentally they've been involved in actual trials which
> > are likely to be more relevant to them than your anti-FSF paranoïa)
> I prefer to rely on existing precedences which had been approved by
> courts, and not a political party's wishful thinking.

Simply put, can you stop trolling?

This is not an anti-GPLv3 trollfest, we have real things to discuss.
You are just distracting with irrelevant trolling arguments.

Did I say trolling? :-)

Simo.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux