Simo Sorce wrote:
Well there are 2 possible situations: A) The projects that depend on samba are willing to address the licensing problem B) They are not
C) They are willing to consider a move but they need more time.
If A we have time, we are talking about F9, plenty of time. If B then they have 2 choices: B.1) Drop functionality B.2) Implement/maintain/whatever their own SMB/CIFS support
3) Introduce a compatibility package and maintain it for a while before sorting out the licensing details. Samba developers have claimed before they will still provide security and bug fixes for the older codebase for a while so this option is feasible.
Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
