On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 19:56 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 10/9/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't see any way out of a > > maintaining a GPLv2 version of Samba for a while unless everyone > > involved moves to GPLv3 or compatible licenses for their own software > > quickly if they are dependent on Samba. > > is kdebase/kdebase4 the only problem package(s) currently in fedora proper? I think most of GNOME should be ok as it is LGPL or GPLv2+, the only app I know that is v2 'only' seem to be Evolution, but I have no idea if Evolution uses libsmbclient for anything, it seem unlikely, but it would be nice to get some confirmation about that. Simo. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
