Re: yum-updatesd in F8?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/9/07, Luke Macken <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:49:00PM +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
> > On 09/10/2007, Mike C <mike.cohler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Can someone say if yum-updatesd will be in F8 final
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > - and if so whether it
> > > really works or not?
> >
> > Yes. It really WORKSFORME.
> >
> > >  It never did for me in F7.
> >
> > Sorry to hear it. I have also found it flaky in F7 but there is always
> > bugzilla and rawhide to test from if you can.
>
> yum-updatesd has seen *significant* improvements since F7,
> especially with memory usage.
>
>      Private  +   Shared  =  RAM used       Program
>       6.6 MiB +   2.0 MiB =   8.6 MiB       yum-updatesd

1) Does yum-updatesd still block yum and piruit? Causes newbies some headaches.

2) Does the GUI (pup?) work in KDE?

3) Is there a silent download, interactive install mode?

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux