On 10/9/07, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Samba as a project has every right to re-license its codebase as it > > sees fit. But at the same time, don't we as a distributor have some > > responsibility to make sure we introduce that change in such a way to > > minimize potential licensing violations? I think we do. > > However, changing the license differently from upstream doesn't really > help anybody. s/license/soname/ correct? ;) yes I agree here we should convince upstream to do so.. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
