On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 09:39 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 09:34 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Essentially unless the entire dependency chain for Samba is GPLv3 > > > compatible, a new samba version under GPLv3 or later would be > > > impossible > > > to pull as incompatible licensing is a liability for the distribution > > > and not necessarily for the individual components. > > > > It's the other way around, it is KDE (Konqueror uses libsmbclient) that > > depends on Samba, Samba has no dependency problems at all. > > Yeah, samba just ignores the problems that it causes for its > dependencies... Excuse me ? Simo. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
