Re: rpms/liblrdf/FC-6 liblrdf.spec,1.6,1.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:41:25 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 07:22:33 -0400, Anthony Green (green) wrote:
> > 
> >> Author: green
> >>
> >> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/liblrdf/FC-6
> > 
> >> -%exclude %{_datadir}/ladspa/rdf/ladspa.rdfs
> >> +%{_datadir}/ladspa/rdf/ladspa.rdfs
> > 
> > What's the full story here?
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313#c6
> > What has changed?
> 
> nando (on copy now) filed the following bug...
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277361

So, what happens is that Hydrogen still displays lots of empty
categories even for the core ladspa plugins. liblrdf still doesn't
care about the ladspa.rdfs file.

But when the ladspa.rdfs file is installed (although it is installed
from within an "examples" directory), only then any ladspa plugins
which come with an .rdf file are classified inside Hydrogen. *urks*

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux