On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 08:36 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> > Not sure if I should have started a new thread, but...
> >
> > If you *are* going to keep or eventually revive readahead, it would be
> > nice to deal with the fact that all the firefox entries in default.later
> > are /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.3/, but the current firefox is
> > firefox-2.0.0.5.
>
> imo, avoid the mess, firefox could use an unversioned folder,
> say, /usr/lib/firefox. I assume there's good reasons not to do this tho,
> else the firefox packagin/maintainer would be doing this already, right? :)
I thought of that (and had the same question). Also thought
of /etc/readahead.d/readahead.early.d/, etc. and having packages include
their own readahead files.
I don't pretend to know enough to have a preference or if there's a
better mechanism than either of those.
>
> -- Rex
>
>
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
