Matthew Saltzman wrote: > Not sure if I should have started a new thread, but... > > If you *are* going to keep or eventually revive readahead, it would be > nice to deal with the fact that all the firefox entries in default.later > are /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.3/, but the current firefox is > firefox-2.0.0.5. > > That is, version-dependent listings in readahead don't get updated when > the target package version changes. Firefox is the most likely to get > out of sync, but there do seem to be some other version-dependent > listings. > I think the readahead list *really* needs to be self-healing somehow (if it can be demonstrated that it actually does optimize boot performance when properly set up.) -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
