On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:02:06PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:19:11PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:06:52 -0500 > > Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > (GPLv2 is somewhat unclear if the 3 years is from the first > > > distribution, or the last...) The koji archive with lots of > > > incremental builds would be many times the size of the SCCM storage > > > needs. > > > > This is what has made me reluctant to venture toward using 3b. The > > uncertainty of when that 3 years starts, added to that the people > > making use of 3c, do we the 3b folks have to keep things around for 3 > > years after a 3c person makes a release? Does the 3year clock start at > > the first distribution of an update or does it start with each respin > > that includes the update but still hosted by Fedora? > > > > I'd like some serious clarification on these items BTW, we've had this discussion before... http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-March/msg00219.html I've forwarded this thread and the above linked thread to brett@xxxxxxx for comment. My gut feeling is that using GPLv2 3b means we need nearly infinite storage somewhere, which last time I checked we don't have... -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
