On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 01/10/2007, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Thoughts? > > > > As modules could be loaded at any time, it would seem the most > > correct way would be to do it via a modprobe.d or udev rule. > > > > I see your point. But, taken to it's logical conclusion, we'd scrap sysctl.conf > completely. > > Actually, that would be the right thing to do - it's currently a badly defined > ad hock kludge. How many modules export sysctls instead of module parameters? -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
