http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week39 = Weekly EPEL Summary = Week 39/2007 == Most important happenings == * Nothing major == EPEL SIG Meeting == === Attending === * [:DennisGilmore:dgilmore] * [:JesseKeating:f13] * [:ThorstenLeemhuis:knurd] * [:MarekMahut:marek] * [:MikeMcGrath:mmcgrath] * [:KevinFenzi:nirik] * [:KarstenWade:quaid] * [:WarrenTogami:warren] === Summary === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/PackageMaintainer/GenericJobDescription and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/CommunicationPlan -- quaid * both were approved -- nobody complained on the list last time it was discussed (that was some weeks ago) and we can easily updated when people want to see something changed * task--quaid: put it properly in the wiki (link on the frontpage, everywhere else where needed? and similar stuff) * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Rhel51 -- unassigned * new ask page created by knurd to track preparations we likely should do for 5.1 * when to remove yum-utils and other packages that are not part of RHEL? * leave the package in the repo until at least CentOS catches up, then drop them? * nirik> | I'm happy to work on bugging people about broken deps and trying to work on the repo for the next testing/final move. * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/RhelMetaData -- stahnma * skipped * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/KojiAndBodhiForEpel -- unassigned * moving to bodhi requires that we switch to koji, which first needs the ability to hide RHEL binaries from the world * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc * yum-cron * things are in the works to get this issue fixed; see https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-September/msg00087.html * do more on the list and less in the meetings; "Power to the people with no delay." aka "make Steering Committee nearly unimportant" and "new schedule page" * some discussions around this to improve workflow and do stuff like "if nobody complains on the list (or in the IRC meetings) its simply considered accepted" * knurd> | it's just a general idea IMHO; we just need to find way to realize that idea; the new stuff in the wiki is a first step for I hope we do more, but I don't know yet exactly what to do; suggestions welcomed * Free discussion around EPEL * nirik> | I have almost caught up on security checking for epel... * nirik> | there are some packages that were never built, but have branches. Might be good if we could gather a list of those and ping maintainers to build or work on deps to build * nirik> | finally, did we ever determine about pushing from testing->stable more often? Or should I bring that up on the list again? * we prepare one; will decide if we just do it or if we do it together with 5.1 * dep scripts running for testing these days? mmcgrath> | knurd: I don't think they are, I'll do that now. * task--mmcgrath -- dep scripts running for testing === Full Log === https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-September/msg00110.html == Stats == === General === Number of EPEL Contributors 1 We welcome 1 new contributors: till === EPEL 5 === Number of source packages: 670 Number of binary packages: 1299 There are 9 new Packages: * amavisd-new | Email filter with virus scanner and spamassassin support * fedora-package-config-smart | Fedora EPEL configuration files for the Smart package manager * jack-audio-connection-kit | The Jack Audio Connection Kit * libid3tag | ID3 tag manipulation library * mathml-fonts | Mathematical symbol fonts * optipng | A PNG optimizer and converter * python-fedora | Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services * smart | Next generation package handling tool * wavpack | A completely open audiocodec === EPEL 4 === Number of source packages: 421 Number of binary packages: 859 There are 1 new Packages: * wavpack | A completely open audiocodec ---- ["CategoryEPELReports"] -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
