On 9/21/07, Richi Plana <myfedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Same thing I've been saying, but it's only now that I realized that I've > been assuming the wrong thing. When I read FHS, in my mind, I was > thinking LSB. So here I was thinking that Fedora was simply following > some guidelines set up by the FSB for its directory hierarchy. Now that > I know that FHS refers to the Fedora Hierarchy Structure, this changes a > few things. > > As I said, I thought it referred to an LSB guideline which made me think > Fedora could be flexible with its interpretation and implementation. > > Now that I've read up on the FHS, I have to say that it needs reworking > if only because some of the things it states contradict others. The FHS /is/ part of the LSB specification. It's the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard as promoted by the OpenGroup. See here: http://www.opengroup.org/testing/lsb-fhs/ The Fedora Project adopted it with the exception of libexecdir. Best wishes, Oisin Feeley -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
