On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 14:11 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote: > >>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > JK> Because the FHS is broken on this issue. They claim that it's for > JK> site admins to use and distributions can't layout any files that > JK> may disrupt or overwrite what a site admin may already have in > JK> place. > > Why don't we ignore the part of FHS that is broken, instead of > ignoring the part of FHS that arguably isn't? That is, put stuff in > /srv complete with layout, and stop polluting /var? Well, don't stop there. Treat FHS as an upstream and send a patch request to have it changed. It only makes sense to patch our packages if a change really makes sense and upstream takes a while to move (they probably have to go through a longish process to make changes). -- Richi Plana -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
