On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 at 23:24, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Umm, you have it backward. When I was originally writing in the multilib > > support I asked how it should be done and was told, at the time, by > > Jeremy that it should install both of them b/c that's what users would > > want/expect. At least, that's what I vaguely recall. This has been about > > 3 years, now. > > Well, I think it was like that 3 years ago. > > Now it seems users want x86_64 only, they don't want i386-devel, > they maybe want i386 Firefox (can the Flash be used with some 32->64 > wrapper?) nspluginwrapper works quite well. Regards, R. -- Fedora contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
