Harald Hoyer wrote: > Bill Nottingham schrieb: >> Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: >>> There's a 1.1.6-5 pending which has this file marked as %ghost (as a >>> hack to make the transition from hardcoded symlinks to alternatives >>> working smoothly). Are %ghosted files considered "provided" by RPM? >> >> You can also do: >> >> Provides: /path/to/file >> for things provided by alternatives. > The problem was, that, if the previous symlink was not ghosted, rpm > removed it after alternatives set up the symlinks in %post. right, another case where %ghost + alternatives would help. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
