-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:44:16 +0300 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Martin Marques wrote: > > > The thing is that the discussion started flipping towards why, if > > there is a binary symlink, there isn't a man page symlink? This > > could, in the case of cdrecord and wodim, or mkisofs and genisofs, > > end in bugtrack tickets for those packages, but I am more > > interested in a general solution, for all packages that have binary > > symlinks. > > > > So, shouldn't there be something in respect of this issue in the > > packaging policy? > > I support that (or the more or less AFAIK equivalent 'echo ".so > man1/wodim.1" > > cdrecord.1' approach as an alternative to symlinks). Could you > > write a > draft for that? I can take it onwards from there in the packaging > committee. I would suggest creating a cdrecord(1) man page that says "This is no more. See wodim(1), which replaces it." Put that cdrecord(1) man page into the wodim package. This way, we teach people that there's been a change and we don't get "Um, when I type 'man cdrecord' I get a man page for something totally different; what gives?" kinds of questions/bug reports/requests. Of course, adjust the verbage appropriately in the "this command went bye-bye" man pages. - -- Lamont Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ] NOTE: All messages from this email address should be digitally signed with my 0xDC0DD409 GPG key. It is available on the pgp.mit.edu keyserver as well as other keyservers that sync with MIT's. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG8Xon+YBsl9wN1AkRAhdtAJ43J8X8zY++WFz3J/yP2rp5zNhcUwCgpbtn YHhhBo5yl29FWGpPCR8RDTc= =KqqQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
