Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:10 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:Hi, On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:04:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:What does this rpmlint message mean? I don't understand why it's harmful to have patches only applying to particular architectures.----- ical.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch3: ical-2.2-ia64.patch A patch is applied inside an %ifarch block. Patches must be applied on all architectures and may contain necessary configure and/or code patch to be effective only on a given arch. -----It likely means that you have a construct like this in a spec file: %ifarch x86_64 Patch1: some.patch %endifBesides this, this patch seems rather silly to me. Instead of trying to mess around with local defs of gethostname(), you should probably better "#include <unistd.h>". Ralf PS.: __linux__ is the correct (POSIX-compliant) define to identify linux.
This code is ancient history anyway. Development on ical was _abandoned_ around 1994.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
