On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 14:04 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > I was thinking about this over the weekend. We have "shutdown" > > > sections in services so that you can restart a service while running, > > > however we don't necessarily have to "shut down" the services when we > > > shut down the system. > > > > Right, and not doing it cuts shutdown in half. However, since it's a > > change in interface, you'd have to tag each service that you don't care > > about shutting down separately. Which sucks. > > > > would this be as a simple as modifying chkconfig so that if there isn't > a 3rd field in the: > # chkconfig: levels start_order stop_order > > line in an initscript that it just didn't make the stop symlink? Doesn't this potentially interfere with un-mounting file systems? So we always kill -9 em? Simo. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
