Michael Schwendt wrote: >> It's unclear (to me anyway) whether these truly are optional or not, ie, >> I have yet to determine here (or in the jasper case) whether apps assume >> the >> presence tools/binaries. In short, I'm playing it safe, and keeping the >> same behavior as when there wasn't a -libs split. > > For jasper, the executables are _example programs_. RTFM confirms that. I've found at least one example (kopete?) where it assumes the presence of the jasper binary. > For OpenEXR, they are referred to as additional utilities. The prefix > "exr" in their names does not appear in any of the libs. OK, well, I guess we can take the "remove it and see if anything breaks" approach too. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
