Re: Can Name=GenericName go away now, please?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthias Clasen wrote:

>> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:05:16 -0500
>> > Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> >> I'm aware of the history that brought us to this point, and using
>> >> the
>> >> generic items, but I think it's time to re-evaluate the decision,
>> >> especially in the context of fedora's various spins.
> 
> How do Fedoras various spins change the circumstances that lead to the
> decision ?

Say Fedora Spin X decided to start naming all their "default" apps
similarly.  More specifically, wow would you react if the KDE spin started
calling kmail "Email client" or kword "Word Processor" in the menus too? 
Wouldn't you agree this is a bad path to follow and/or a bad precedent to
set?

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux