Leo wrote:
On 2007-09-16 13:37 +0100, Alex Lancaster wrote:Hmm, I notice that gnutls is used as a shared library in many applications that it might be non-trivial to update if the .so version is bumped because it will require a lot of rebuilds.That's why it is difficult for users to upgrade this package. I try to remove Gnutls and that will remove 299 packages that depend on it as well.
Does anyone know if this new GnuTLS is API and/or ABI compatible? I know that they broke a load of API functions between 1.0 and 1.4, which required a source patches and retesting for libvirt.
Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
