On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 13:59 +0200, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 08:45 -0200, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > > This is just not worth changing defaults over. IPv6 is the future > > (whether you like it or not), so lets just leave it there to be as ready > > as possible when the ship sails. I haven't swithced to IPv6 either, but > > it takes less that 30 secs to disable it on a newly installed system. 30 > > secs that I can easily spare on this. > > A whole 30 seconds? You can actually get proper IPv6 connectivity in > that amount of time, if you have a public IPv4 address: > > echo IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=tun6to4 >> /etc/sysconfig/network > echo IPV6INIT=yes >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 > echo IPV6TO4INIT=yes >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 This worked beautifully until Charter cable got into bed with Microsoft, in which case I suddenly found 6to4 being quietly dropped into the bitbucket and non-existent DNS entries redirecting to their search engine. http://slashdot.org/articles/07/02/15/0432259.shtml Fucking bastards. (Yes, I fixed the DNS problem using dnsmasq's bogus-nxdomain option. IPv6 can still be had with Miredo but it doesn't let me route a native subnet at the router like 6to4. Miredo should be in Fedora, if possible. :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
