On 9/12/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Right to left as in random places? If so upstream needs to verify the > licenses of these icons carefully. We are both uncertain about the licensing right now. That's why I'm asking on this mailing list. > It does not. However the other way around is possible. What problem are > you trying to solve? The problem I'm trying to solve is: which license should I use with fedora's new licensing guidelines ? On 9/12/07, Kevin Kofler wrote: > GPL->LGPL is not a valid conversion indeed. Ok, for now I'll be using GPLv2. > It's more likely that the affected upstream projects either aren't aware of > what's going on or don't really care about the license for something as simple > as an icon. Most likely both. Still, it's bad. kmenu-gnome's upstream cares, but needs advice. > I'd say declare the license as GPL to be on the safe side. In this context, it > probably doesn't make a real difference anyway. (How do you "link" a menu > icon?) The icons are listed on the desktop files. Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
