On Di September 11 2007, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > When doing this please also consider Secondary Archs. I try to consider everything that is properly documented. I do not even know, how secondary archs use Fedora, e.g. do they need rebuilds of packages to obtain changes or do they use specs directy from the cvs. > what archs does it make sense to have vbetool on? I do not know, I guess every arch that supports real-mode video BIOS codes. Debian provides only packages for i386 and x86_64 according to packages.debian.org, so maybe it does not work for other archs. I do not know and I do not have the means to test this. In case there is a hidden koji setup with secondary arch builders, where I can submit srpms to test whether a package compiles, I will send my packages there and add the required ExcludeArchs/%ifnarchs where needed. Btw. if you know more about secondary archs, maybe you want to check, whether the requires for radeontool in pm-utils is also a problem. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
