Chris Jones wrote: > Also, +1 to the fact its not as good a news as if ATrpms had also been > incorporated. If rpmfusion and ATrpms turn out as (in)compatible as say > livna and ATrpms are now, then on a practical level the merger is no > where near as useful as it could have been. Yeah, +10 to it being nowhere as good as if ATrpms were included in the merger, since the bulk of the overlap/conflicts in the 3rd-party repo world are between livna and ATrpms. Now they'll just be between rpmfusion and ATrpms. Suck. End-users still lose. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
