On Sunday 09 September 2007, Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed one thing that cheered me up a bit - splitting of > xine-lib-arts from xine-lib-extras. Well, but the problem is that > xine-lib-extras, which has a set of useful plugins like support for > pulseaudio, is dependent on xine-lib-arts. And xine-lib-arts pushes arts > which in turn pushes qt. If I'd like to use xine-lib as an engine for > various gtk based players (totem-xine or gxine to name a few), with the > plugins in xine-lib-extras and don't want to push the qt dependency, it > is currently a no-go. Is there a chance of separating the arts plugin > completely? I happened to ask the same thing from Aurelien a few days ago - I found it surprising too. He said something about plans to possibly gradually split more stuff out of xine-lib-extras and to have -extras eventually as just a metapackage that pulls all these "extra" things in. I have no problem with that, but nor do I have any problem with removing the dependency either. Aurelien? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
