Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-09-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 08 September 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat,  8 Sep 2007 10:42:06 -0400 (EDT), buildsys wrote:
> > rdieter AT math unl edu:
> >
> >     kdeartwork-extras
> >       FE6 > F7 (0:3.5.7-2.fc6 > 0:3.5.6-3.fc7)
> >
> >     kdegraphics-extras
> >       FE6 > F7 (0:3.5.7-1.fc6 > 0:3.5.5-1.fc7)
> >
> >     kdemultimedia-extras
> >       FE6 > F7 (6:3.5.7-1.fc6.5 > 6:3.5.6-5.fc7)
>
> These look like false positives, because as I understand it, the script
> checks SRPMS, and the old -extras src.rpms are obsolete and the -extras
> binary packages are built from different SRPMS.

You're right, the script operates on SRPMs.  But these are not strictly 
speaking false positives - there *is* a newer SRPM by those names in FE6 than 
in F7.  OTOH, there's probably nothing that the maintainer can do about this 
as the F7 SRPMs are in the release (not updates) tree, so I'll whitelist them 
in the scripts.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux