On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 15:54 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 15:12 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> A college of mine wanted to use umbrello in our Universities labs, since the > >> Linux install there are Fedora he asked me about umbrello for Fedora. > >> > >> Since I could NOT find it, I packaged it, see: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283471 > >> > >> But then I got a comment to the review it was already in Fedora in kdesdk. But > >> then why on earth doesn't kdesdk have a Provides umbrello so that yum install > >> umbrello works? Or even better an umbrello sub-package? > >> > > > > File a bug with the maintainer of kdesdk and ask them add provides for > > each of the programs that it includes. > > > > Do it for all of the items you think is important. I think that's a fair > > thing to do. > > > > I forgot to say in my mail I already did that, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283521 > > But that still doesn't solve the version interlocking of completely unrelated > packages. No, it doesn't. But since we're past freeze - adding a provide is much easier than breaking the entire package out. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
