On 08.09.2007 02:39, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] >> The real solution IMHO is to make two lists: >> >> * a "developers" list, where only developers (be it Fedora developers, >> developers of other distributions or developers of Linux Software we >> ship) discuss. Make it moderated for a months or two to enforce the >> target audience -- I suppose afterwards it will work without moderation >> if we are a bit careful and point people to the right list. > > Doesn't work. I agree that there is a risk that it doesn't work perfectly, but I suppose it will work better then now. There was also the idea to make it moderated fo ever (which IIRC ubuntu did for their major devel-list) for non-developers (witch should includes upstream developers or people developing somewhere in the Linux-space), but some people didn't like that due to the work that will be needed for it. > A list needs a (somewhat fascist) owner to keep posters in > line. Well, I'd say "support from those on the list" is the better approach. Just like in #fedora-devel on freenode you even for easy questions should not get more detailed answers on lists than "your question is off-topic here; go to list foo instead". CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
