Re: Approvals for Security updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak <at> redhat.com> writes:
> A week ago, there remained no time to discuss this on FESCo meeting, so
> I was advised to post it here for comments: [1]
> 
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LubomirKundrak/SecurityUpdateProcessDraft

IMHO, you have to be careful that the approval process doesn't introduce excess 
delays because otherwise you'd encourage even more security updates not to be 
marked as such (and if you implement the automarking when a security bug is 
referenced, also missing Bugzilla references to avoid the security marking), 
which would be counterproductive.

         Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux