On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 02:06 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 23:50 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 <at> freenet.de> writes: > > > [1] IMO, this FESCO decision is a fault and mistake, we all will regret. > > > It molests maintainers with long term development babbling and molests > > > "application developers" with "bureaucracy of Fedora package > > > maintenance" - It's not helpful to both parties. > > > > Well, the biggest problem with -maintainers was that it was only postable > > through on subscription (which also kept people from using tools like the GMane > > NNTP and web interfaces) and that subscription was essentially limited to > > existing maintainers (which kept not only the random users out, but even people > > with legitimate content to post). > Yes, it had been a closed list and maintainers did get automatically s/did/did not/ > subscribed to it - The FESCO of the time this was decided, this approach s/, this approach/, thought this approach to be/ > wise - I never did - But THEM decided otherwise. Sorry, Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
