On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 18:15 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 9/5/07, Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ralf Corsepius wrote, at 09/06/2007 08:57 AM +9:00: > > > > > > maintainers@ and devel@ serve different purposes and are supposed to > > > have different audiences (package maintenance vs. general fedora > > > development) > > > > Also +1 for opposition to kill maintainers@ list. > > I don't think that general Fedora developers or non-Fedora users/developers > > who will see and comment on devel@ list also want to see comments about > > the procedures on build/updates system, package orphan issue, etc... > > > I unsubscribed from -devel a while ago because all I wanted to see was > maintainer issues.. I basically had to spend every day going through > something on -devel to make sense of various posts... at which point > it makes no sense to comment on something in -maintainer when I have > to comment again on -devel. One of the main reasons the -maintainers list was created, was so maintainers didn't need to join a high volume list like -devel. If anything we should work more on making sure maintainer discussions stay on the -maintainers list and not bleed over to -devel, instead of killing the -maintainers list. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
