On 9/5/07, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/09/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:49 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:34 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > > > > Hi, Brian. :) > > > > > > > > Jesse had mentioned on an earlier reply to a fedora-devel-list post > > > > about discussion with FESCo of killing the maintainers list. Will this > > > > be in the meeting, as well? > > > > > > Probably, though I'm against killing it. > > +1. I am also against killing it. > > > > maintainers@ and devel@ serve different purposes and are supposed to > > have different audiences (package maintenance vs. general fedora > > development) > > That is the principle/ideal behind the two lists existing. However, > the reality is there is no distinction between what is posted to > either, just extra work in reading two lists. It's also interesting > that there were no voices of opposition on -maintainers... > Probably because few people maintain packages.. but a lot of people develop them :). -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
