On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:07:21 -0400 Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 18:51 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 30.08.2007 23:46, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > > === EPEL === > > > * FESCo approved a mandate for the continuation of EPEL, and will > > > let the EPEL folks decide on governance. > > > > "Mandate for the continuation of EPEL" -> I didn't know EPEL itself was > > questioned or time limited. The EPEL Steering committee mandate was time > > limited and we asked to extend it, so I assume that's what you meant? > > Correct. > > > Further: so it was extended. Thanks. But was it extended for a unlimited > > time? Or just by one day, week, month, half a year, a whole year? > > My intention was for an unlimited time. Does anyone else from FESCo > disagree with that? I recall the consensus of the meeting being that EPEL is doing great as-is, so unlimited seems fine with me. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
