> libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.i386 requires libedit >= 0:2.9 > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.i386 requires libedit.so.0 > [...] > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.x86_64 requires libedit.so.0()(64bit) > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.x86_64 requires libedit >= 0:2.9 > [...] > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.ppc requires libedit >= 0:2.9 > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.ppc requires libedit.so.0 > [...] > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.ppc64 requires libedit.so.0()(64bit) > libreadline-java - 0.8.0-19.fc8.ppc64 requires libedit >= 0:2.9 I see that libedit is lying orphaned for a few months. I have just finished creating a package for it and will be submitting a review request as soon as I can access Bugzilla (http://debarshiray.multiply.com/journal/item/102/Can_not_access_bugzilla_anymore ). For the time being, Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libedit.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libedit-2.10-1.20070831cvs.fc8.src.rpm Koji log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=145172 By the way, after creating the package I noticed that libedit's devel branch in CVS is not 'marked' dead.package. Happy hacking, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
