Le samedi 01 septembre 2007 à 07:53 +0200, Alexander Boström a écrit : > This reminds me... > > I've been meaning to propose a Better Kerberos Integration Project. Is > there anyone else out there who's dissatisfied with the lack of simple > and pervasive integration and support for Kerberos in the free operating > systems, applications and protocols? IMHO kerberos app support is the wrong level to tackle. We all know active directory is just kerberos+ldap, we've been shipping kerberos & ldap infrastructure for years (and the fedora directory server is supposed to be even better), and yet somehow few (if any) ever use it. Contrast it with the widely reviled active directory infrastructure every windows user just uses by default. Making kerberos+ldap a breeze to setup should be the priority. Once there users will pressure app writers themselves to get kerberos support built-in (and Red Hat has erred spending many years maintaining its own kerberized forks and ignoring the setup problem). This BTW would also kill all the poor man ldap clones app writers are so fond of (because it's easier writting your own contact db implementation than explaining to users how to setup an actual ldap server) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
