On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:58:26 -0400 "Colin Walters" <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/31/07, David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Some packages are essentially the upstream source for a project, > > > Yes, and I think this should be strongly discouraged. For starters, spec > files and patches are a poor substitute for revision control. It also makes > it significantly more painful for other people to reuse the work (c.f. the > Ubuntu developer's request). > > If we have situations like this - put up a project on > hosted.fedoraproject.org. Or code.google.com. Or sourceforge. Done and done. I moved mine, but some haven't moved and probably won't for a while. Even when they do move, the project will need to change how it handles recording changes going forward. I'm just saying that having a script mow down changelog entries is a bad idea. It should be in the hands of the package maintainer. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat / Westford, MA
Attachment:
pgpnVKuVFCluL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
