Re: Proposed changes to buildsys-build group (otherwise known as the Exceptions list)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:08 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:22:06AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> 
> > So we now have to buildrequire even the packages from the third list
> > above? Such as binutils, glibc-devel, glibc-headers and kernel-headers?
> 
> I seem to recall that kernel-headers should never be needed explicitely. 
Well, that's what I consider to be a packaging bug.

IMO, kernel-headers should never be needed unless explicitly required
(or being pulled-in indirectly).

Ralf


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux