On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:08 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:22:06AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > So we now have to buildrequire even the packages from the third list > > above? Such as binutils, glibc-devel, glibc-headers and kernel-headers? > > I seem to recall that kernel-headers should never be needed explicitely. Well, that's what I consider to be a packaging bug. IMO, kernel-headers should never be needed unless explicitly required (or being pulled-in indirectly). Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
