Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:16:27 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote: > >> - 5 packages present in the development repo which have no owners >> entry >> audacious-docklet This one depends on how you parse the tree. :) audacious-docklet is the name of the package and spec file, but the name of the cvs module, bugzilla component, and pkgdb entry is audacious-plugins-docklet. Ideally things would be renamed to match. The review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/218258 It seems that it was supposed to be renamed but it hasn't been done completely. The module was renamed, but the spec file and name of the package wasn't. Interestingly, there's a request in the review bug from upstream asking NOT to distribute this package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/218258#c20 So shouldn't this package be EOL'd? >> s390utils There's no CVS module. There's an empty merge review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/226385 Is this in any supported Fedora arches? I thought it was only for s390 and s390x arches? >> stardict-dic This package was split into several subpackages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/231267 It was removed from cvs, but not from bugzilla. It seems that it should be. >> sturmbahnfahrer This was renamed to stormbaancoureur: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/199310#c15 The files in the sturmbahnfahrer CVS module should be removed and a dead.package added. It should also be removed from the bugzilla components list for any releases where it was never built. >> ufsparse > > "no owners entry" means only the pkgdb admins can do something about > it. But ufsparse is active in cvs for example. ufsparse was renamed to suitesparse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/246231 Same story as sturmbahnfahrer: files should be removed, dead.package added, bugzilla component dropped (again, for any releases for which it was never built). While we're on the subject, I ran across a few things while tracking license tag changes that seem to need similar clean up. The following modules have a dead.package file, along with other files: digikamimageplugins digikamimageplugins-doc kdeartwork-extras kile-i18n kimdaba ks3switch python-astng superkaramba The files other than the dead.package file should be removed from CVS I think. Then there's the ws-common-utils module. The package name and spec file are named ws-commons-util, which also exists as a module in CVS, both names are in bugzilla. The review request shows some confusion by using both names at various places: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/232728 One or the other should be removed from CVS and bugzilla. I'd say it is ws-common-utils, since the actual package name is ws-commons-util. Finally, what's up with the glibc{32,64} modules? Were they ever used? Are they needed in CVS still or can they be dropped? (They're not in bugzilla or the pkgdb, nor in the repos.) Sheesh, that's about enough bugzilla for me tonight. ;) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The only reason we still have elections in this country is to see if the pollsters were right. -- Ed Rollins
Attachment:
pgp0e0EQthlgs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
