On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:08 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:55:12PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:10:57 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > > > > > I also considered util-linux, when jnovy mentioned that a package > > > needs "kill" to build properly. But I came to a conclusion that > > > "kill", "mount", nor any other command from util-linux doesn't have > > > to be in the minimal buildroot. > > > > arch, flock, getopt, rename are nice to have by default. > > well, might be nice, but I'm afraid we need to be more exact. > > Could you please find out or estimate, for each of the utils you > mentioned: Instead of trying to cater each and everybody's demand I'd simply start with standards, such as FHS/LSB and POSIX. > If the number of packages affected is small, and if the broken > packages are easy to discover and fix, we can leave util-linux out. Check POSIX, you'll find several of the util-linux tools are covered by it, e.g. kill. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
