On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:10:27PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > > > I would like to discuss the status of our features for F8 at tomorrow's > > FESCo meeting. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/FeatureList > > > > With Feature Freeze behind us on 2007-08-28 it is time to make some > > decisions about what should live on the final approved feature list. The > > feature policy is fairly clear about features that should be dropped. > > > > see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy#drop > > > > In accordance with this policy it would not be out of line to drop features > > without recent updates or completion at 100%. Some of the more incomplete > > TeX Live inclusion is marked done at 100% but it is untrue. The packages > are not approved yet, and in my opinion we should not hurry. Moreover I > think that giving time limits to review is bad. A review should be > finished when the package is 'perfect' from a packaging point of view, > not because of a deadline. In the TeX Live case this is highly visible > because this is a complex package, and in my opinion it needs split up > which requires a lot of work and other reviews. I marked it as completed from 90% now. The primary task of the TeXLive feature was to replace teTeX functionality so I set it to 100% as soon as it applied. Maybe it was too optimistic and I might have neglected solving legal problems which have nothing to do with functionality. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
