Patrice Dumas wrote:
Those licensing issues would be blockers in general, but in that case some problematic softwares are in tetex already, it is an already existing issue, so I think it is not unacceptable to have problematic parts goes in, given that most of the time the issue is that a license is missing, and the author intention is certainly to make free software.
If we are distributing software without a clear written license, we should stop doing so. If you did do it without the knowledge that there is a problem, then that is different from knowingly ignoring a licensing issue and you can suffer more damages as a result. It is a blocker.
I mailed all the issues I found out to the texlive maintainer and Spot is also doing a license review.
Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
