On 29.08.2007 20:18, Brian Pepple wrote: > /topic FESCO-Meeting -- Follow-up -- obsoleting kmod proposal: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DavidWoodhouse/KmodProposal - dwmw2, f13, > |DrJef| Wow, lot's of words -- seems we are really on our way to "Bureaucratic 2.0". Well, as I'm one of those that was a major driver for kmod's in Fedora Extras: +1 for the proposal. If anyone wonders why it gets my support: it was something different when we had Core and Extras (that's the short explanation, but I think it should make the biggest reason obvious). Nevertheless some comments: - if we are doing "Bureaucratic 2.0" then let's please do the easy steps as well and discuss a proposal like this on the list properly for some days(¹) and don't try it in nearly hiding mode by just mention it in a "Plan for tomorrows FESCO meeting" where it easily missed. E.g. cut'n'paste the whole text into a mail, give it a subject with "RFC", put some introducing words on the top and send it to fedora-devel for comments. Earlier the 24 hours before the FESCo meeting it might be ratified in please, to give people a chance to comment on proposals, even if they are 24 afk - (partly a question for the Packaging committee as well) The current Kernel Module standard was not only meant for Fedora, but for RHEL also and a suggested one for 3rd party Fedora-repos as well. Are those still a goal? If not: will the stuff simply be removed from the Guidelines, to make them easier to read? CU knurd (¹) -- Or did I miss such a RFC? If yes: sorry. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
